DOGE: Department of Gatekeeping Everything

The biggest thing we exposed this week, in my opinion, is the coordinated effort to go after any White, Non-Jew, potential government or White House hire who states objective facts about the ADL, World War II, the Holocaust, Leo Frank, etc.

Kingsley Wilson is just the latest microcosm of what appears to be a much larger, more deeply-rooted and extremely systemic issue that America is finally uncovering and only now beginning to fully grasp.

What this indicates to me is a much higher level of coordinated scrutiny and gatekeeping is happening right now within our own government and government-partnered “private” entities and NGOs. It’s an illegal onboarding (discrimination) and pre-screening process that’s racial, religious and informational in nature, which tells me that they are desperate to protect a level of corruption happening within a specific “in-group” far beyond what we originally anticipated.

Their overt commitment to scrutinizing the hiring of white, non-Jews, even with regard to objectively true and factual information, indicates that they believe White, non-Jew Americans willing to tell the truth about history MUST be kept out at all costs.

So now, the question becomes, why?

Is it because we would be absolutely furious if we were ever allowed inside the gates and took a peek at how bad they’ve really been taking advantage of us for so long?

Or is it because their corruption is significantly worse and even more readily apparent from the inside that they can’t risk the threat of an outsider (who isn’t in their “in-group”) seeing what they’ve really been up to all these years?

Or worst of all, is it both?

I heavily lean towards “both”, because I consider myself to be an honest, reasonable person, and I Notice™️ how unpopular their policies, opinions, and tendencies are with regular Americans on TwitterX.

But more than that, I also Notice™️ their ongoing commitment to intellectual dishonesty and moral inconsistency and their willingness to apply rules/laws/terms according to the malleable tenets of what’s most acutely convenient for them and their “in-group” preferences in any situation. This certainly includes attacking the truth and its truth-tellers. In fact, they’re so averse to any truths, facts and findings that might oppose or hinder their overall “in-group” agendas that they proactively work to gate-keep their own opposition, and handpick those who can be credentialed as an “Official, Credible Truth-Teller™️” in the public domain. They’ve gone so far as to preemptively CREATE their own threats (or “campus protests”) in order to justify maintaining their unique, self-appointed powers as official “arbiters” of the most pressing issues facing America today.

Nothing makes this more evident than their feigned-opposition campus protests, their coordinated astroturfing of DOGE, the pseudo-consensus mass approval of their purported purveyors of government spending (misappropriation) “data”, the current administrators of GSA and the specific personnel (and their business/financial/personal ties) behind each. And all the major players behind each of those aforementioned facets, Cohencidentally™️ enough, happen to have ideologically congruent (favorable) opinions towards that same “in-group”, who always ends up as the greatest beneficiary. It’s the kind of shameless, consistent good fortune that would make even “Lucky Larry” blush.

I’ll have more later, but for the time being, this’ll have to do. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to get back to work on creating alt account #9 over on TwitterX. Cheers.🫡

Decent™️ Jonathan